Reading from When Atheism Becomes Religion by Chris
Hedges
In
her novel The Song of the Lark, Willa
Cather writes that the Native Americans of the Southwest made pottery to house
water once they had housed themselves.
All their customs and ceremonies and their religion went back to water,
which [is] one of the essential elements of life…[in her novel, the story]
continues: “When Thea took her bath at the bottom of the canyon, in the sunny
pool behind the screen of cottonwoods, she sometimes felt as if the water must
have sovereign qualities, from having been the object of so much service and
desire. That stream was the only living
thing left of the drama that had been played out in the canyon centuries
ago. In the rapid, restless heart of it,
flowing swifter than the rest, there was a continuity of life that reached back
into the old time. The glittering thread
of current had a kind of lightly worn, loosely knit personality, graceful and
laughing. Thea’s bath came to have a
ceremonial gravity. The atmosphere of
the canyon was ritualistic.
One morning, as she was standing
upright in the pool, splashing water between her shoulder-blades with a big
sponge, something flashed through her mind that made her draw herself up and
stand still until the water had dried upon her flushed skin. The stream and the broken pottery: what was
any art but an effort to make a sheath, a mold in which to imprison for a
moment the shining, elusive element which is life itself—life hurrying past us
and running away, too strong to stop, too sweet to lose?”
Sermon
This isn’t
going to be a theological conversation about the differences between atheism,
agnosticism, and theism, or how belief in a deity, a god, goddess, or
supernatural being, is irrational to an atheist. What I want to explore are the myths about
atheists and the potential richness of atheism.
This is British comedian Ricky Gervais. He is an atheist. The quote reads: “It is a strange myth that
atheists have nothing to live for. It’s
the opposite. We have nothing to die
for. We have everything to live
for.” There are many such myths in our
culture about atheism. Would you agree
that atheists have nothing to live for?
Of course not. So when Ricky says
here that atheists have everything to live for, what does that mean?
I can’t say that I have ever told someone that I am an
atheist. I can say that there was a time
in my life when I turned away from a belief in any kind of god, particularly
the god of the Christian religion. This
change had to do with feeling that the Catholic religion no longer spoke to me,
didn’t make sense to me, and I could no longer, due to rational consideration
of and my heartfelt understanding of how the world worked, believe in a
religion, perhaps any religion.
What I could count on was the feeling of connection that I had
with people in my life. They loved me
and I loved them. We were and are there
for one another. We support one another. We share the complexity of our lives with one
another. I have, over the years, added
to the group of people I consider intimate friends; people whose love and trust
I can count on and turn to in difficult times.
And people with whom I can share the many profound experiences that life
offers me.
One experience, perhaps the most profound in my life, one
that still stays with me at a very deep place and is a foundation for meaning
and purpose in my life, was the birth of my first son. I was 29 years old. Martha and I had decided that we were finally
ready to bring children into our lives.
For many years we didn’t think we were ready because we had both been
brought in homes that had some serious dysfunction, and we wondered what kind
of parent we would be. But, finally we
were felt we were ready. Martha got
pregnant and we were very excited. We
told everyone. We started looking for
strollers and car seats and such. Then
Martha had a miscarriage. The doctors
told us this was normal. We were very
sad and a little disoriented, not sure how to proceed or what to tell our
family and friends. Then Martha got
pregnant again. And again she had a
miscarriage. We were devastated. The doctors started talking about waiting,
and recommended genetic testing, which we did.
The doctors expressed some mild concern about our ability to have
children. And we probably should have
been more careful, hearing all this, but we weren’t. And Martha got pregnant again before the
results of our genetic testing came back.
This time we didn’t want to tell anyone; heck we were even hesitant to
tell the doctor. When Martha did go see
a doctor, a test was administered to check the baby’s genetics. We were scared to death when the result
returned positive for possible genetic defects.
Our doctor reassured us that the tests had a high false-positive
occurrence, and re-sent the sample for additional lab work. Martha and I experienced several anxious,
stressful weeks before receiving the news that our baby was genetically
okay. And yet we still waited until
after the first trimester to tell anyone besides the doctor. When we told everyone, it was with joy in our
hearts that we could barely hold in our chests.
I was in the surgical room when Martha had an emergency
C-section. She was awake to see the
birth of our first child. And she was
very clear that I couldn’t take a video of the birth. There was blood as they cut into Martha
abdomen, but there was also a big 10 and a half pound baby. I took Aaron, our son, over for Martha to
see. I watched as he made his first
sound, as the doctor cut the cord, as the nurses washed him, I was there and I
wouldn’t have been anywhere else in the world at that moment. Being there for the birth changed me in more
ways than I can adequately verbalize. I
felt I had everything to live for, perhaps for the first time in my life. And at that time of my life, I was, for all
practical purposes, an atheist.
This is
American author, journalist, motivational speaker, and long-distance swimmer,
Diana Nyad. She is an atheist who is in
awe of people, the beauty that surrounds her, and life itself. Another common myth is that atheists must
have a pretty boring life because they don’t experience life with the same
depth of wonder and appreciation for life that people who have faith do.
Atheist
Tamim Ansary wrote (in book faith: noun \’faith’\ essays from believers,
agnostics and atheists):
“Many years ago, my family and I want camping on Mount
Lassen, California. My daughters were
four and ten years old at the time…Next to our campground was a large pond
encircled by a path, and one afternoon we decided to take a walk before
dinner. Along the way, we stopped at a
small cove to enjoy the view. When we
were ready to move on, my four year old, Elina, resisted. Stoutly.
She wanted to play some more right there.
I felt some
impatience. I had entered upon this walk
with sense of purpose, a goal (to get back to where we started). But oh well.
I told Debby and Jessamyn to keep going; I’d stay with Elina and we’d
catch up.
Elina went on squishing mud under her
toes, and I sat peacefully by the water, and gradually, my impatience
subsided. I relaxed about my goal. I allowed myself to just appreciate. I was grateful to Elina for making me
linger. But then, at last I had seen
everything there was to see here and had done all the appreciating a man can do
in one spot. Time to go.
Unbelievably,
Elina was not ready. She pleaded with me
to linger longer. I sighed and said,
“Okay, a little longer.” She went back
to the mud and I went back to the view.
I thought I had exhausted what there was to see, but it turned out there
was so much more—subtleties I had not noticed before: the way ripples of light
caught the tips of the waves to form a single shimmering pattern…the
composition formed by snow-capped [mountains] looming above the trees…and the
smell of the air, a moisture in which snow and pollen were mingled…Wow, I would
never have experienced all this had I hurried on. But okay, now we were done. Now we really used up this spot…We had to get
dinner started. I said, “Come on,
Elina. Let’s go.”
“Noooo!”
she howled, “Not yet, Daddy!” This time,
her resistance was downright exasperating, and I was going to put my foot down,
and yet…for some reason…I succumbed to her pleading once again. Just a few more minutes, I thought. But this time, when I sat back down, it was as
if I had fallen though some screen and suddenly there were layers upon layers
here—such depth, so much going on. In
the air between [the mountains] and me hovered a shape-shifting cloud of
gnats. Down at the water’s edge, little
water bugs with paddle-like legs were skimming the surface, busy with their
tiny lives. From the branch of a bush
hanging over them, a spider was constructing its web. A fish jumped in the water. The light on [the mountains] had changed
because the sun was moving. A breeze
across the waves ruffled those ripples of light. The color of the water had changed and was
still changing because time was passing, night was falling, and now the gnats
were dispersing… How could I imagine I had exhausted this place—or any
place? Every place is inexhaustible. And
that is when something popped. Until
that moment, I had been living in a stream of events that constituted my
life…But this spot had an ongoing life of its own. And just as this spot was an event in my
life, I was an event in its life…And what was true of this spot was true of
every spot: the entire, everlasting everything was going on right now and would
go on going on. At some point in the future,
I would stop existing—but not the universe.
And to the extent that I was part of it all, I would not be [entirely]
gone either.”
There are
many preconceived opinions that people in our culture have about atheists. Here is some: that atheists are freethinkers,
secular humanists, naturalists, infidels, rationalist, apostates, skeptics,
heretics, materialists, bright, non-theists, agnostics, nonbelievers. Some of these qualities many be true of some
atheists and not others. And there are
other generalizations, based on lack of information or limited experience, that
many people in our culture hold about atheists: atheists hate religion;
atheists believe in nothing; atheists have just replaced religion with science;
atheists are just atheists until their life is threatened; atheism is a white
male thing; atheists don’t have a moral code; atheists are hedonists who don’t
understand the meaning of love; atheists’ lives lack meaning; atheists are
angry, aggressive, defensive, intolerant of others; and atheists believe that
everything in the universe arose by chance.
There are many articles out there about these generalizations, or myths
as the literature calls them, and I would encourage you to read some of them. As I listed these generalizations or myths,
what did you think and feel? Do you
reject them all? Do you wonder if some
of them have a kernel of truth?
I quoted
Neil deGrasse Tyson from a video I watched in our call to worship: “The moment someone attaches you to a
philosophy or a movement, then they assign all the baggage and all of the rest
of the philosophy that goes with it to you. And when you want to have a
conversation, they will assert they know everything important there is to know
about you because of that association.
That’s not the way to have conversation.
I’m sorry, it’s not. I’d rather
we explore each other’s ideas in real time,
rather than assign a label to it, and assert you know what is going to
happen next.” Some atheists hold
deGrasse up as one of their own, but he refuses to accept the label of
atheist. If pressed he identifies
himself as an agnostic. He doesn’t want
the prejudices that the label atheist incurs; he doesn’t want people to think
they know all about him just by that association. And I would agree with him.
I have met
many atheists in my time as a Unitarian Universalist. None of them were exactly the same. Big surprise right. But it is easy to accept a
generalization/myth that you have heard about atheists if one person embodies
that generalization/myth. Take the myth
that atheists are angry and defensive, particularly when talking about
religion. Well, I have certainly met a
few atheists who were are like that. But
I have met many more who were compassionate and accepting of other faiths. There was a discussion about Islam and religion
a few weeks ago at a gathering of the Humanists of Western Suburban Chicago
here at this church. Some of you
attended. One of the speakers was Jason
Heap, the national coordinator for the United Coalition of Reason. He has applied to be an atheist chaplain in
the armed services. He talked about how
he felt honored to be invited to the religious rituals and ceremonies of people
of faith, and how he understood the meaning and importance of these rituals to
these people. I was able to spend time
with him before the presentation and listened closely as he talked during the
presentation. Not once did I hear him
angry or defensive, not once did I hear him belittle, criticize, or discount
any religion or religious tradition, even though he was frustrated by the
difficulties he was having becoming an atheist chaplain, and dismayed that some
evangelical ministers were lobbying against him. However, he didn’t belittle the faith of
these evangelicals; he simply expressed frustration about how they were
impeding him from becoming a chaplain. I
heard him that night talk about his own beliefs with authenticity, focusing on
what was important to him about his beliefs.
He talked with passion about the need for an atheist chaplain; a person
willing to provide spiritual and emotional support to our armed service
members, regardless of whether they were atheist, agnostic, unsure of their
beliefs, or people of faith, regardless of their religious tradition.
All labels,
in the end, tend to one-dimensionalize that which is labeled. “Christian”—boom, put that in a box and on
the shelf. “Muslim”—okay that is in a
box and up on the shelf.
“Atheist”---zip! We put that in box and shoved it on the shelf with all
the other boxes. We don’t have to look
inside any of the boxes again to know what is inside them, because we’ve
labeled them so we know at a glance. How
often do we do that? How often has each
of us done that today? Atheists choose a
way of looking at people, life, and the world that can be rich and full of
meaning. A path just as rich as any
other belief system or religion or spirituality. Each of us has choices in how we live in the
world, how we interact with others, how deeply we choose to go into an
experience. We can choose a prickly path
that reacts against those different from ourselves or a peaceful path that
enriches our lives when we meet someone different from ourselves. We all have choices. I invite us to put aside our pre-conceived
notions of others and to resist the urge to settle for the surface-only
understanding that labelling offers.
Listen to each person we encounter—listen to them as they talk about
what they believe, what they value, what enriches their life, what has
transformed them, what passions call to their hearts. Take that labeled box off the shelf, open it
up, and explore the treasures inside. We
have so much to learn if we choose this way of being with one another.
Atheism
affirms rationalism, nontheism, science, and skepticism. But it is not limited to these; as with any
other belief, atheism can invite a person into awe and wonder, meaning and truth,
purpose and passion. Like the Native
American women who molded a pot to hold their water and their mythology. Let us keep in mind that each time we create
a pot, a label, the water it holds is not static. The pot is static, a moment in time, a set
experience; the water keeps flowing, changing, it never stops. Life hurries past us and runs away, too
strong to stop, too sweet to lose. May
we embrace life and each other, understanding that none of us is static, we are
all flowing, changing, strong and too sweet to lose.
No comments:
Post a Comment
Please follow the Seven Principles when commenting. Offensive and off topic comments will be removed.